Mr N Jolly v Better Bathrooms UK Ltd (in Administration) and Secretary of State for BEIS (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2020] UKET 2402467/2019 (28 January 2020)

The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to redundancy pay and certain contractual payments, as the statutory requirements were met and the company was in administration.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2020] UKET 2402467/2019
Parties: Claimant: Mr N Jolly; Respondent: Better Bathrooms UK Ltd (in Administration); Respondent: Secretary of State for BEIS
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 28 January 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Redundancy Pay

Employment Law Breach of Contract Redundancy Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr N Jolly

Claimant

Better Bathrooms UK Ltd (in Administration)

Respondent

Secretary of State for BEIS

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant is entitled to payments for breach of contract and redundancy under employment law

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to redundancy pay and certain contractual payments, as the statutory requirements were met and the company was in administration.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

Secretary of State for BEIS to pay statutory redundancy and other sums to claimant

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.