Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Big Marketing (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16811 (01 March 2016)

Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Big Marketing (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16811 (01 March 2016)

The Panel found that the domain name was identical or similar to the Complainant's trademark and that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, constituting an abusive registration.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] DRS 16811
Parties
Complainant: Jaguar Land Rover Limited; Respondent: Big Marketing
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
01 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jaguar Land Rover Limited

Complainant

Big Marketing

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the Respondent is an Abusive Registration under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the domain name was identical or similar to the Complainant's trademark and that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, constituting an abusive registration.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the Complainant