Bindery Machinery Services v Revenue and Customs (VAT - PENALTIES : Default surcharge) [2016] UKFTT 151 (TC) (02 March 2016)
The tribunal held that BMS did not have a reasonable excuse for the late VAT payment. The cash flow issues and administrative errors were foreseeable and had occurred previously, so they could not be considered unforeseen or outside BMS's control. The appeal was dismissed and the surcharge upheld.
- Citation
- [2016] UKFTT 151
- Parties
- Appellant: Bindery Machinery Services; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Default Surcharge Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Default Surcharge, Reasonable Excuse, Late Payment Penalties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bindery Machinery Services
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Default Surcharge Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether insufficiency of funds constitutes a reasonable excuse for late VAT payment
- 2 Whether administrative error or reliance on staff is a reasonable excuse under VAT legislation
- 3 Whether the surcharge was correctly assessed at 5%
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal held that BMS did not have a reasonable excuse for the late VAT payment. The cash flow issues and administrative errors were foreseeable and had occurred previously, so they could not be considered unforeseen or outside BMS's control. The appeal was dismissed and the surcharge upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Surcharge of £5,009.01 upheld against Bindery Machinery Services
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment