Hooper & Weston v Bing Digital Consultancy Ltd (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17715 (18 August 2016)

Hooper & Weston v Bing Digital Consultancy Ltd (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17715 (18 August 2016)

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or that they had rights in respect of the domain name.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17715
Parties
Complainant: Hooper & Weston; Respondent: Bing Digital Consultancy Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
18 August 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
No Action
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hooper & Weston

Complainant

Bing Digital Consultancy Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 Whether the registration of the domain name by the respondent was abusive
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in respect of the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or that they had rights in respect of the domain name.

Court Disposition

No Action