Mr B Johnson v Birmingham City Council: (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Equal Pay Act : Sex Discrimination : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 1315628/2013 (26 April 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which discrimination could be inferred and that the respondent provided non-discriminatory explanations for pay and wage deductions.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 1315628/2013
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr B Johnson; Respondent: Birmingham City Council
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Equal Pay, Sex Discrimination, Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Employment Law Discrimination Law Age Discrimination Equal Pay Sex Discrimination Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr B Johnson
Claimant
Birmingham City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination
- 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to sex discrimination
- 3 Whether there was a breach of the Equal Pay Act
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which discrimination could be inferred and that the respondent provided non-discriminatory explanations for pay and wage deductions.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment