Ms Lorna Bailey v Birmingham City Council (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Equal Pay Act : Sex Discrimination : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 1313418/2010 (15 September 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to unlawful deduction from wages but did not establish sufficient evidence for age or sex discrimination or breach of equal pay provisions.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 1313418/2010
- Parties
- Claimant: Ms Lorna Bailey; Respondent: Birmingham City Council
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Partially upheld
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Equal Pay, Sex Discrimination, Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Employment Law Discrimination Law Age Discrimination Equal Pay Sex Discrimination Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Ms Lorna Bailey
Claimant
Birmingham City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant suffered age discrimination
- 2 Whether the claimant suffered sex discrimination
- 3 Whether the claimant was entitled to equal pay
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to unlawful deduction from wages but did not establish sufficient evidence for age or sex discrimination or breach of equal pay provisions.
Court Disposition
Partially upheld
Orders
- The respondent must reimburse the claimant for the unlawful deduction from wages.
- No further orders regarding discrimination or equal pay.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment