Miss B Blake v Birmingham City Council (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination) [2020] UKET 1306619/2019 (10 January 2020)

The Tribunal found that Birmingham City Council failed to make reasonable adjustments for Miss B Blake's disability, constituting unlawful disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2020] UKET 1306619/2019
Parties: Claimant: Miss B Blake; Respondent: Birmingham City Council
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 10 January 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Disability Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments, Equality Act 2010

Employment Law Disability Discrimination Reasonable Adjustments Equality Act 2010

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Miss B Blake

Claimant

Birmingham City Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of disability
2 Whether reasonable adjustments were made by the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Birmingham City Council failed to make reasonable adjustments for Miss B Blake's disability, constituting unlawful disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Birmingham City Council to pay compensation to Miss B Blake for disability discrimination
Birmingham City Council to implement reasonable adjustments as specified by the Tribunal

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.