Mr K Statham v Blackpool Council (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Fixed Term Regulations : Public Interest Disclosure : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 2405235/2016 (12 July 2017)

The tribunal determined whether the claimant's dismissal and treatment breached statutory protections and contractual obligations, applying relevant employment law principles.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2405235/2016
Parties: Claimant: Mr K Statham; Respondent: Blackpool Council
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 12 July 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Partially upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Fixed Term Regulations, Public Interest Disclosure, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Employment Law Breach of Contract Fixed Term Regulations Public Interest Disclosure Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr K Statham

Claimant

Blackpool Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was a breach of contract
3 Whether there was unlawful deduction from wages

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the claimant's dismissal and treatment breached statutory protections and contractual obligations, applying relevant employment law principles.

Court Disposition

Partially upheld

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.