Mansfield Superbowl v Bludelta Limited (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17290 (09 June 2016)

Mansfield Superbowl v Bludelta Limited (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17290 (09 June 2016)

The complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive or that it had enforceable rights in the domain name.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17290
Parties
Complainant: Mansfield Superbowl; Respondent: Bludelta Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
No Action
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mansfield Superbowl

Complainant

Bludelta Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by Bludelta Limited is abusive or infringes the rights of Mansfield Superbowl

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive or that it had enforceable rights in the domain name.

Court Disposition

No Action