Dyson Research Limited v BLUE MOUNTAIN WATER LIMITED (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17463 (12 July 2016)

Dyson Research Limited v BLUE MOUNTAIN WATER LIMITED (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17463 (12 July 2016)

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17463
Parties
Complainant: Dyson Research Limited; Respondent: BLUE MOUNTAIN WATER LIMITED
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
12 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer granted
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Domain Name Transfer Passing Off

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dyson Research Limited

Complainant

BLUE MOUNTAIN WATER LIMITED

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's registration constitutes an abusive registration

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

Transfer granted

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant