Miss R Atcha v Bolton MBC (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2019] UKET 2414620/2018 (6 March 2019)

The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which the tribunal could conclude that age discrimination had occurred.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2019] UKET 2414620/2018
Parties: Claimant: Miss R Atcha; Respondent: Bolton MBC
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 06 March 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Age Discrimination

Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss R Atcha

Claimant

Bolton MBC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on grounds of age

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which the tribunal could conclude that age discrimination had occurred.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.