Mr L Faricy v Booker Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2019] UKET 2414700/2018 (23 January 2019)
The tribunal found that the claimant did not establish that he made a protected disclosure or suffered detriment as defined by law.
- Citation
- [2019] UKET 2414700/2018
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr L Faricy; Respondent: Booker Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr L Faricy
Claimant
Booker Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant did not establish that he made a protected disclosure or suffered detriment as defined by law.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment