Boxmoor Construction Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 833 (TC) (21 August 2014)
The Tribunal found that retention of the facade was not an explicit or implicit condition of planning permission, and the planning consent was for alteration and extension, not demolition and new build. Therefore, the construction services did not qualify for VAT zero-rating under Schedule 8, Group 5, Item 2(a) VATA 1994.
- Citation
- [2014] UKFTT 833
- Parties
- Appellant: Boxmoor Construction Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Zero Rating, Construction Services, Planning Permission, Demolition Vs Alteration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Boxmoor Construction Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether construction services supplied by Boxmoor Construction Ltd qualify for VAT zero-rating as construction of a new dwelling under Schedule 8, Group 5, Item 2(a) VATA 1994
- 2 Whether retention of facade was a condition of planning permission under Note 18 of Group 5
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that retention of the facade was not an explicit or implicit condition of planning permission, and the planning consent was for alteration and extension, not demolition and new build. Therefore, the construction services did not qualify for VAT zero-rating under Schedule 8, Group 5, Item 2(a) VATA 1994.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Construction services supplied by Boxmoor at 28 Cavendish Drive are not zero-rated for VAT purposes
- HMRC's VAT assessments are upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment