Arcola Products v Boxxinc (Summary Decision _No Action) [2020] DRS 22699 (22 July 2020)

Arcola Products v Boxxinc (Summary Decision _No Action) [2020] DRS 22699 (22 July 2020)

The Panel found that the Complainant failed to establish that the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2020] DRS 22699
Parties
Complainant: Arcola Products; Respondent: Boxxinc
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 July 2020
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Rights
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arcola Products

Complainant

Boxxinc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the Respondent is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the Complainant failed to establish that the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name