United Kingdom Judgment

Boyle v Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd & Ors [2026] CAT 45 (12 May 2026)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the respondents did not abuse a dominant position and that collective proceedings were not appropriate in this instance.

Court disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • No relief granted to applicant
  • Costs to be determined separately

02

Material facts

Parties

David Courtney Boyle

Applicant

Govia Thameslink Railway Limited

Respondent

Others

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Competition Appeal / Final Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant alleged that Govia Thameslink Railway Limited and others abused their dominant position in the rail transport market, causing harm to consumers.
Respondent
Respondents denied abuse of dominance and challenged the suitability of collective proceedings.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 1998

    Abuse of dominant position under competition law

  2. 02

    Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules

    Criteria for collective proceedings

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondents did not abuse a dominant position and that collective proceedings were not appropriate in this instance.

Court disposition

claim dismissed

  • No relief granted to applicant
  • Costs to be determined separately

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2026] CAT 45

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal >> Boyle v Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd & Ors [2026] CAT 45 (12 May 2026) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2026/45.html Cite as: [2026] CAT 45 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] David Courtney Boyle v Govia Thameslink Railway Limited & Others [2026] CAT 45 (12 May 2026) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 45.pdf BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2026/45.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.