Imperial Tobacco Ltd v Brainfire Group [2006] DRS 3386 (26 March 2006)

Imperial Tobacco Ltd v Brainfire Group [2006] DRS 3386 (26 March 2006)

The complainant has rights in the LAMBERT & BUTLER mark, which is identical or similar to the domain name. The respondent's use of the domain name to generate advertising income by leveraging the complainant's mark constitutes taking unfair advantage and is likely to cause confusion, amounting to abusive registration.

Citation
[2006] DRS 3386
Parties
Complainant: Imperial Tobacco Limited; Respondent: Brainfire Group
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Outcome
Domain name to be transferred to the complainant
Legal Topics
Trade Marks, Domain Names, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Information Technology Trade Marks Domain Names Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Imperial Tobacco Limited

Complainant

Brainfire Group

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
  2. 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant has rights in the LAMBERT & BUTLER mark, which is identical or similar to the domain name. The respondent's use of the domain name to generate advertising income by leveraging the complainant's mark constitutes taking unfair advantage and is likely to cause confusion, amounting to abusive registration.

Court Disposition

Domain name to be transferred to the complainant

Orders

  • The domain name lambertandbutler.co.uk is to be transferred to Imperial Tobacco Limited