QSoft Consulting Limited v Bret Kelly (Summary Decision _No Action) [2010] DRS 9052 (23 November 2010)

QSoft Consulting Limited v Bret Kelly (Summary Decision _No Action) [2010] DRS 9052 (23 November 2010)

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2010] DRS 9052
Parties
Complainant: QSoft Consulting Limited; Respondent: Bret Kelly
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Information Technology Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

QSoft Consulting Limited

Complainant

Bret Kelly

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the disputed domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name