Giorgio Armani SPA Milan , Swiss Branch Mendrisio (trading as Emporio Armani) v Brian Mullen (Summary Decision_Transfer) [2011] DRS 9671 (27 April 2011)

Giorgio Armani SPA Milan , Swiss Branch Mendrisio (trading as Emporio Armani) v Brian Mullen (Summary Decision_Transfer) [2011] DRS 9671 (27 April 2011)

The panel found that the complainant had established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] DRS 9671
Parties
Complainant: Giorgio Armani S.P.A. Milan, Swiss Branch Mendrisio (trading as Emporio Armani); Respondent: Brian Mullen
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
27 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
domain name transferred
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Giorgio Armani S.P.A. Milan, Swiss Branch Mendrisio (trading as Emporio Armani)

Complainant

Brian Mullen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

domain name transferred

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.