Mr P Burch v British Airways plc (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2023] UKET 3309902/2022 (17 March 2023)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not suffer detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2023] UKET 3309902/2022
Parties: Claimant: Mr P Burch; Respondent: British Airways plc
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 17 March 2023
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr P Burch

Claimant

British Airways plc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant suffered detriment due to making a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not suffer detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.