Mr H Jamal v British Red Cross: (England and Wales : Sex Discrimination) [2017] UKET 3346878/2016 (17 February 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which the tribunal could conclude that there was sex discrimination by the respondent.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 3346878/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr H Jamal; Respondent: British Red Cross
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr H Jamal
Claimant
British Red Cross
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of sex
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which the tribunal could conclude that there was sex discrimination by the respondent.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment