Mr D Mehlhoffer v Bryan’s Salads Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Contract of Employment : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 2401047/2016 (23 March 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that the respondent failed to provide required written statements, constituting breaches of statutory obligations.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2401047/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr D Mehlhoffer; Respondent: Bryan’s Salads Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Contract of Employment, Public Interest Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal, Written Statements
Employment Law Breach of Contract Contract of Employment Public Interest Disclosure Unfair Dismissal Written Statements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Mr D Mehlhoffer
Claimant
Bryan’s Salads Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether there was a breach of contract
- 3 Whether there was a failure to provide written statements
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that the respondent failed to provide required written statements, constituting breaches of statutory obligations.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld in part
Orders
- Compensation awarded to the claimant for unfair dismissal
- Compensation awarded for failure to provide written statements
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment