Mr O Farafonov v BSA Technologies Ltd and others (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Breach of Contract : Race Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 1300061/2017 (12 July 2017)

Mr O Farafonov v BSA Technologies Ltd and others (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Breach of Contract : Race Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 1300061/2017 (12 July 2017)

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which discrimination could be inferred and whether the respondent had provided a non-discriminatory explanation. The tribunal also considered whether the dismissal was procedurally and substantively fair and whether any deductions from wages were lawful.

Citation
[2017] UKET 1300061/2017
Parties
Claimant: Mr O Farafonov; Respondent: BSA Technologies Ltd and others
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
12 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text
Legal Topics
Age Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Breach of Contract, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Employment Law Age Discrimination Race Discrimination Breach of Contract Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr O Farafonov

Claimant

BSA Technologies Ltd and others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to race discrimination
  3. 3 Whether there was a breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which discrimination could be inferred and whether the respondent had provided a non-discriminatory explanation. The tribunal also considered whether the dismissal was procedurally and substantively fair and whether any deductions from wages were lawful.

Court Disposition

Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text