Build-A-Bear UK Holdings limited v Revenue & Customs (CUSTOMS DUTY - classification 'accessories') [2019] UKFTT 707 (TC) (27 November 2019)
The Tribunal held that while some items (such as general clothing and accessories without specific features for stuffed animals) are properly classified as 'accessories' for toys/dolls under CN headings attracting 0% duty, other items with features specifically for stuffed animals (e.g., slits for tails/ears) are not so classifiable and fall under headings attracting 4.7% duty. The appeal was allowed in part, with directions for reclassification and recalculation of duties accordingly.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT 707
- Parties
- Appellant: Build-A-Bear UK Holdings Workshop Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Customs Duty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Customs Classification, Import VAT, Combined Nomenclature, Toy Accessories, Tariff Codes, Duty Repayment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Build-A-Bear UK Holdings Workshop Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Customs Duty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct customs classification under the Combined Nomenclature for various 'accessories' imported by Build-A-Bear for use with toys and dolls?
- 2 Are the disputed items properly classified as 'accessories' for toys/dolls or under other headings attracting higher duty?
- 3 Is HMRC's refusal to repay customs duties and import VAT lawful?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that while some items (such as general clothing and accessories without specific features for stuffed animals) are properly classified as 'accessories' for toys/dolls under CN headings attracting 0% duty, other items with features specifically for stuffed animals (e.g., slits for tails/ears) are not so classifiable and fall under headings attracting 4.7% duty. The appeal was allowed in part, with directions for reclassification and recalculation of duties accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Some items to be reclassified as 'accessories' for toys/dolls under CN headings attracting 0% duty; others to remain under headings attracting 4.7% duty as determined by their specific features.
- HMRC to recalculate customs duties and import VAT in accordance with the Tribunal's findings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment