Mr R Wingfield v Burry and Knight (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2019] UKET 1402728/2018 (25 July 2019)
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure within the meaning of the Act and therefore did not suffer detriment as a result.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] UKET 1402728/2018
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr R Wingfield; Respondent: Burry and Knight
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr R Wingfield
Claimant
Burry and Knight
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
- 2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure within the meaning of the Act and therefore did not suffer detriment as a result.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment