Burton Skip Hire Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Procedure - Application by Appellant to exclude documents exhibited to statements of Respondents - witnesses but not included in their List of Documents - Whether direction required to admit such documents) [2025] UKFTT 1113 (TC) (17 September 2025)
A party may not rely on documents not included in its List of Documents without first obtaining a direction from the Tribunal; however, where relevant documents are omitted from the LOD but subsequently exhibited to witness statements, the Tribunal has discretion to admit them if fairness requires, particularly where the proceedings are at an early stage and the opposing party is given an opportunity to respond.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 1113 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Burton Skip Hire Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal (landfill Tax) / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility of Documents Prior to Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Application by Appellant dismissed; Cross-Application by Respondents allowed; Disputed Documents admitted.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Admissibility of Evidence, Tribunal Procedure, Case Management Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Burton Skip Hire Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal (landfill Tax) / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility of Documents Prior to Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a party can rely on documents not included in its List of Documents (LOD)
- 2 What sanction is appropriate for non-compliance with disclosure directions
- 3 Whether the Tribunal should admit the disputed documents
Ratio Decidendi
A party may not rely on documents not included in its List of Documents without first obtaining a direction from the Tribunal; however, where relevant documents are omitted from the LOD but subsequently exhibited to witness statements, the Tribunal has discretion to admit them if fairness requires, particularly where the proceedings are at an early stage and the opposing party is given an opportunity to respond.
Court Disposition
Application by Appellant dismissed; Cross-Application by Respondents allowed; Disputed Documents admitted.
Orders
- Disputed Documents exhibited to HMRC's witness statements are admitted into evidence.
- Proceedings stayed for 28 days to allow parties to propose case management directions, including provision for Burton to respond to the Disputed Documents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment