T Kendall v C Higgo (England and Wales : Redundancy) [2023] UKET 2207928/2022 (31 January 2023)
The tribunal found that a genuine redundancy situation existed and that the respondent followed a fair redundancy process, so the dismissal was not unfair.
- Citation
- [2023] UKET 2207928/2022
- Parties
- Claimant: T Kendall; Respondent: C Higgo
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
T Kendall
Claimant
C Higgo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy
- 2 Whether the redundancy process was fair
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that a genuine redundancy situation existed and that the respondent followed a fair redundancy process, so the dismissal was not unfair.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment