Cable & Wireless plc v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 32 (TC) (27 March 2009)
The Appellant did not have a pre-existing right to claim input tax for April 1997 invoices at 1 May 1997 because the right to claim could only be exercised at the end of the VAT period (30 June 1997), after the three-year time limit was introduced. Therefore, the claims are time-barred. The claim for £20,000, initially deducted and then assessed by HMRC, is properly a Regulation 29 claim and not a section 80 claim, but this does not affect the outcome.
- Citation
- [2009] UKFTT 32 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Cable & Wireless plc; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Input Tax Claim Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax, Input Tax Deduction, Time Limits for Claims, Transitional Provisions, Interpretation of VAT Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cable & Wireless plc
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Input Tax Claim Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant's late claim for input tax is to be made under Regulation 29(1) of the VAT Regulations 1995 or under section 80(1B) of the VAT Act 1994
- 2 Whether the three-year time limit introduced by Regulation 29(1A) on 1 May 1997 applies to input tax incurred and invoiced in April 1997, where the VAT period ended after 1 May 1997
- 3 Whether the Appellant had 'pre-existing rights' to claim input tax such that the time limit could not be invoked
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellant did not have a pre-existing right to claim input tax for April 1997 invoices at 1 May 1997 because the right to claim could only be exercised at the end of the VAT period (30 June 1997), after the three-year time limit was introduced. Therefore, the claims are time-barred. The claim for £20,000, initially deducted and then assessed by HMRC, is properly a Regulation 29 claim and not a section 80 claim, but this does not affect the outcome.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment