Ellis v London Borough Of Camden [1995] UKEAT 959_94_2802 (28 February 1995)
No discernible point of law arises from the Tribunal's reasons; the findings were matters of fact for the Tribunal, and there was no misdirection in law or improper approach to the evidence or arguments presented.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 959_94_2802
- Parties
- Appellant: Camden Blackworkers Group; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Industrial Tribunal Procedure, Positive Discrimination, Appeal on Point of Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Camden Blackworkers Group
Appellant
Unknown Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal misdirected itself in law regarding race discrimination
- 2 Whether the applicant was denied a fair opportunity for promotion or 'acting up'
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider a pattern of discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
No discernible point of law arises from the Tribunal's reasons; the findings were matters of fact for the Tribunal, and there was no misdirection in law or improper approach to the evidence or arguments presented.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal is dismissed; no further hearing will be granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment