1st Choice Leisure Buildings v Shearhod [2006] DRS 3944 (24 October 2006)
The complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence of enforceable rights in the name or mark and did not demonstrate that the domain name registration was abusive or caused confusion as required by the Policy.
- Citation
- [2006] DRS 3944
- Parties
- Complainant: 1st Choice Leisure Buildings; Respondent: Cameron Shearhod
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Abusive Registration, Goodwill, Unregistered Trademark Rights, Generic Domain Names
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
1st Choice Leisure Buildings
Complainant
Cameron Shearhod
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence of enforceable rights in the name or mark and did not demonstrate that the domain name registration was abusive or caused confusion as required by the Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint dismissed
Orders
- The domain name shall remain in the hands of the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment