Capper Pass Ltd v Lawton [1976] UKEAT 346_76_1076 (19 October 1976)
Work of Mrs. Lawton was of a broadly similar nature to that of Mr. Smith and Mr. Brattan; differences were not of practical importance in relation to terms and conditions of employment, so equality clause applies.
- Citation
- [1976] UKEAT 346_76_1076
- Parties
- Appellant: Capper Pass Ltd.; Respondent: Mrs. J. B. Lawton; Comparator: Mr. Smith; Comparator: Mr. Brattan
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay, Sex Discrimination, Equality Clause, Like Work
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Capper Pass Ltd.
Appellant
Mrs. J. B. Lawton
Respondent
Mr. Smith
Comparator
Mr. Brattan
Comparator
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Is Mrs. Lawton entitled to an equality clause in her contract under the Equal Pay Act, 1970, as amended by the Sex Discrimination Act, 1975?
- 2 Are the differences between Mrs. Lawton's work and that of Mr. Smith and Mr. Brattan of practical importance in relation to terms and conditions of employment?
Ratio Decidendi
Work of Mrs. Lawton was of a broadly similar nature to that of Mr. Smith and Mr. Brattan; differences were not of practical importance in relation to terms and conditions of employment, so equality clause applies.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Equality clause confirmed in Mrs. Lawton's contract.
- Order varied to ensure Mrs. Lawton's hourly rate for 40 hours matches Mr. Smith and Mr. Brattan's hourly rate for 40 hours (excluding overtime premium).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment