Carbon Six Engineering Ltd v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - HMRC application to set aside Barring Order) [2026] UKFTT 177 (TC) (29 January 2026)
The Tribunal refused HMRC's application to set aside the barring order and for relief from sanctions. The judge found HMRC's breach of the unless order was serious and significant, not credibly explained, and part of a sustained pattern of non-compliance with Tribunal directions. The reasons advanced—administrative error, change of legal team, and use of a clearing house email—were not sufficient to justify relief. The prejudice to the Appellant, the need for procedural discipline, and the authority of unless orders outweighed the arguments for reinstatement. The Tribunal exercised its discretion under rule 8(8) to allow the appeal summarily against HMRC.
- Citation
- [2026] UKFTT 177
- Parties
- Appellant: Carbon Six Engineering Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Application to Set Aside Barring Order; Decision on Relief From Sanctions
- Outcome
- Application refused; appeal allowed summarily against HMRC
- Legal Topics
- Tribunal Procedure, Relief From Sanctions, Barring Orders, Case Management, Compliance With Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carbon Six Engineering Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Application to Set Aside Barring Order; Decision on Relief From Sanctions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC's application to set aside the barring order should be granted
- 2 Whether relief from sanctions should be allowed under the Tribunal Procedure Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal refused HMRC's application to set aside the barring order and for relief from sanctions. The judge found HMRC's breach of the unless order was serious and significant, not credibly explained, and part of a sustained pattern of non-compliance with Tribunal directions. The reasons advanced—administrative error, change of legal team, and use of a clearing house email—were not sufficient to justify relief. The prejudice to the Appellant, the need for procedural discipline, and the authority of unless orders outweighed the arguments for reinstatement. The Tribunal exercised its discretion under rule 8(8) to allow the appeal summarily against HMRC.
Court Disposition
Application refused; appeal allowed summarily against HMRC
Orders
- HMRC's application to set aside the barring order is refused.
- The appeal is allowed under rule 8(8) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment