Ms C Pritchard and Others v Casual Dining Services Ltd (in administration) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2021] UKET 2415661/2020 (1 September 2021)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and therefore the claimants are entitled to a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2021] UKET 2415661/2020
Parties: Claimant: Ms C Pritchard and Others; Respondent: Casual Dining Services Ltd (in administration)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 01 September 2021
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Protective award granted in favour of the claimants
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Redundancy, Collective Consultation

Employment Law Protective Award Redundancy Collective Consultation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Ms C Pritchard and Others

Claimant

Casual Dining Services Ltd (in administration)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancies
2 Whether claimants are entitled to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and therefore the claimants are entitled to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of the claimants

Orders

Respondent to pay protective award to claimants

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.