Mr AB v CD Ltd (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination : Redundancy : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 1301806/2016 (26 May 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed as the redundancy process was not properly followed and there was insufficient evidence to justify the selection. The tribunal also found that the dismissal constituted disability discrimination but not sex discrimination.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 1301806/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr AB; Respondent: CD Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partly upheld
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Redundancy, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr AB
Claimant
CD Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether the dismissal constituted disability discrimination
- 3 Whether the dismissal constituted sex discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed as the redundancy process was not properly followed and there was insufficient evidence to justify the selection. The tribunal also found that the dismissal constituted disability discrimination but not sex discrimination.
Court Disposition
Claim partly upheld
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment