Ibis London Earls Court / Cockpit Hotel (London) Ltd v Central Reservations (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17119 (12 April 2016)
The complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish rights or abusive registration; therefore, no action was taken.
- Citation
- [2016] DRS 17119
- Parties
- Complainant: Ibis London Earls Court / Cockpit Hotel (London) Ltd; Respondent: Central Reservations
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- No Action
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ibis London Earls Court / Cockpit Hotel (London) Ltd
Complainant
Central Reservations
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name infringes the complainant's rights
- 2 Whether the domain name should be transferred or cancelled
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish rights or abusive registration; therefore, no action was taken.
Court Disposition
No Action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment