Centrethorn Ltd v Walker [1998] UKEAT 85_98_1102 (11 February 1998)

Centrethorn Ltd v Walker [1998] UKEAT 85_98_1102 (11 February 1998)

The appeal was dismissed because the grounds raised were attempts to re-open findings of fact, not questions of law or perverse findings, and the Industrial Tribunal had correctly applied the law to the facts found.

Citation
[1998] UKEAT 85_98_1102
Parties
Appellant: Centrethorn Ltd; Respondent: Mrs Walker
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
11 February 1998
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Statutory Sick Pay
Employment Law Constructive Dismissal Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Statutory Sick Pay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Centrethorn Ltd

Appellant

Mrs Walker

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in finding constructive dismissal
  2. 2 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in finding unfair dismissal
  3. 3 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in finding unlawful deduction of statutory sick pay

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the grounds raised were attempts to re-open findings of fact, not questions of law or perverse findings, and the Industrial Tribunal had correctly applied the law to the facts found.

Court Disposition

application dismissed