CGI Group (Europe) Ltd v Revenue & Customs (Rev 1) [2010] UKFTT 224 (TC) (27 April 2010)
The tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine arguments and evidence relating to legitimate expectation in a VAT appeal under section 83(1)(c) VATA 1994, including where such expectation may affect the amount of input tax creditable, particularly in light of the Human Rights Act 1998 and relevant case law.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 224 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: CGI Group (Europe) Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / Application to Amend Grounds of Appeal and Adduce Additional Evidence Prior to Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Legitimate Expectation, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, VAT Input Tax Credit, Human Rights Act 1998, Supervisory Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CGI Group (Europe) Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / Application to Amend Grounds of Appeal and Adduce Additional Evidence Prior to Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider a legitimate expectation argument in a VAT appeal under section 83(1)(c) VATA 1994
- 2 Whether a legitimate expectation can affect the determination of VAT chargeable or input tax creditable
- 3 Whether the Human Rights Act 1998 extends the tribunal's jurisdiction to grant relief for breach of legitimate expectation
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine arguments and evidence relating to legitimate expectation in a VAT appeal under section 83(1)(c) VATA 1994, including where such expectation may affect the amount of input tax creditable, particularly in light of the Human Rights Act 1998 and relevant case law.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Appellant permitted to add the new ground of appeal based on legitimate expectation.
- Appellant permitted to serve additional evidence in support of the new ground at the substantive hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment