E A Grazioli v Charles Gregory Solicitors Ltd (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2021] UKET 2201726/2020 (13 July 2021)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2021] UKET 2201726/2020
Parties: Claimant: E A Grazioli; Respondent: Charles Gregory Solicitors Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 13 July 2021
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal Protective Award / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Consultation Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

E A Grazioli

Claimant

Charles Gregory Solicitors Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal Protective Award / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy, entitling the claimant to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay a protective award to the claimant for failure to consult as required by law

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.