Chivas Brothers Ltd v Millar (Contract of Employment : Notice and pay in lieu) [2011] UKEAT 0032_10_2601 (26 January 2011)
The facts and correspondence demonstrated a mutually agreed termination through ill health retirement, not a dismissal by the employer. The claimant's subsequent query about notice pay did not alter the prior agreement to terminate. Therefore, the claimant was not entitled to pay in lieu of notice.
- Citation
- [2011] UKEAT 0032_10_2601
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Millar; Respondent: Chivas Brothers Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contract of Employment, Notice and Pay in Lieu, Ill Health Retirement, Mutual Termination, Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Millar
Claimant
Chivas Brothers Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's employment was terminated by the respondent or by mutual agreement
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to pay in lieu of notice
Ratio Decidendi
The facts and correspondence demonstrated a mutually agreed termination through ill health retirement, not a dismissal by the employer. The claimant's subsequent query about notice pay did not alter the prior agreement to terminate. Therefore, the claimant was not entitled to pay in lieu of notice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claim dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- The claimant's claim for pay in lieu of notice is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment