Intelligent Business Transfer Limited v Chris Hampson (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17080 (29 March 2016)

Intelligent Business Transfer Limited v Chris Hampson (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17080 (29 March 2016)

The complainant failed to establish rights in the name or mark and failed to prove bad faith registration by the respondent.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17080
Parties
Complainant: Intelligent Business Transfer Limited; Respondent: Chris Hampson
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
no action
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Intelligent Business Transfer Limited

Complainant

Chris Hampson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether the respondent's registration of the domain name infringes the complainant's rights
  2. 2 whether the domain name was registered in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish rights in the name or mark and failed to prove bad faith registration by the respondent.

Court Disposition

no action