Integrity Refurbishment Ltd v Chris Marsh (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17616 (04 August 2016)

Integrity Refurbishment Ltd v Chris Marsh (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17616 (04 August 2016)

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or that it had enforceable rights under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17616
Parties
Complainant: Integrity Refurbishment Ltd; Respondent: Chris Marsh
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
04 August 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Information Technology Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Integrity Refurbishment Ltd

Complainant

Chris Marsh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name infringes the complainant's rights
  2. 2 Whether the domain name should be transferred or cancelled

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or that it had enforceable rights under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

complaint dismissed

Orders

  • no action taken