Crusader Advertising Limited v Christopher Dale Flannery (Summary Decision _No Action) [2011] DRS 9796 (23 May 2011)

Crusader Advertising Limited v Christopher Dale Flannery (Summary Decision _No Action) [2011] DRS 9796 (23 May 2011)

The panel found insufficient evidence of abusive registration and legitimate rights were established by the respondent.

Citation
[2011] DRS 9796
Parties
Complainant: Crusader Advertising Limited; Respondent: Christopher Dale Flannery
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
no action
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crusader Advertising Limited

Complainant

Christopher Dale Flannery

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 whether the respondent's registration of the domain name infringes the complainant's rights

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found insufficient evidence of abusive registration and legitimate rights were established by the respondent.

Court Disposition

no action