Christopher O'Brien v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 581 (TC) (13 September 2012)
The appeals were struck out because the appellant failed to comply fully and timeously with repeated Tribunal Directions, did not provide crucial documents, and failed to cooperate to such an extent that the Tribunal could not deal with the proceedings fairly and justly. The Tribunal found no realistic prospect of success in the absence of relevant documentation.
- Citation
- [2012] UKFTT 581 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher O'Brien; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Strike Out Application (tax Appeals) / Application Hearing, Not Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals struck out
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Penalties, Tribunal Procedure, Case Management, Compliance With Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher O'Brien
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Strike Out Application (tax Appeals) / Application Hearing, Not Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant complied with Tribunal Directions
- 2 Whether appeals should be struck out for non-compliance and lack of cooperation
- 3 Whether there was a reasonable excuse for failure to provide information
Ratio Decidendi
The appeals were struck out because the appellant failed to comply fully and timeously with repeated Tribunal Directions, did not provide crucial documents, and failed to cooperate to such an extent that the Tribunal could not deal with the proceedings fairly and justly. The Tribunal found no realistic prospect of success in the absence of relevant documentation.
Court Disposition
Appeals struck out
Orders
- Appeals are struck out under Rule 8(1) and Rule 8(3)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009
- Any party dissatisfied may apply for permission to appeal within 56 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment