Singleton v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 118 (TC) (27 May 2009)
The tribunal found insufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of red diesel use for 12 months, accepted the respondent's recalculated assessment as to best judgment, and dismissed the appeal.
- Citation
- [2009] UKFTT 118
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Singleton; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Hydrocarbon Oil Duty, Use of Red Diesel, Excise Assessment, Restoration of Vehicle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Christopher Singleton
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant used red diesel in a road vehicle contrary to statutory prohibition
- 2 Whether the assessment of excise duty was to best judgment and properly calculated
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found insufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of red diesel use for 12 months, accepted the respondent's recalculated assessment as to best judgment, and dismissed the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Assessment of £1,465 upheld
- Right to appeal within 56 days under rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment