Wills v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 174 (TC) (16 April 2010)
The Tribunal found that the work undertaken was essential repair, not a capital improvement or renewal of the entirety. The repairs were necessary due to the dangerous state of the outbuilding, and there was no evidence of a change of use or significant increase in rental income. The costs for repairs and structural works to prevent collapse were allowable as deductions against rental income.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 174
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Wills; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Deductibility of Repairs, Capital Vs Revenue Expenditure, Property Lettings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Wills
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether expenditure on repairs to an outbuilding is deductible as a revenue expense or disallowable as capital expenditure for income tax purposes
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the work undertaken was essential repair, not a capital improvement or renewal of the entirety. The repairs were necessary due to the dangerous state of the outbuilding, and there was no evidence of a change of use or significant increase in rental income. The costs for repairs and structural works to prevent collapse were allowable as deductions against rental income.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appellant is entitled to deduct the repair costs claimed, including structural works, from rental income for tax year 2005/2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment