Wolseley Centers Ltd -v- Chromecoast Ltd [2002] DRS 282 (7 May 2002)
On the balance of probabilities, the complainant has rights in the name BROUGHTON CRANGROVE, the domain name is identical, and the respondent's use created a likelihood of confusion, constituting abusive registration.
- Citation
- [2002] DRS 282
- Parties
- Complainant: Wolseley Centers Limited; Respondent: Chromecoast Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Wolseley Centers Limited
Complainant
Chromecoast Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the name BROUGHTON CRANGROVE
- 2 Whether the domain name broughtoncrangrove.co.uk is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the complainant has rights in the name BROUGHTON CRANGROVE, the domain name is identical, and the respondent's use created a likelihood of confusion, constituting abusive registration.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- Domain name broughtoncrangrove.co.uk to be transferred to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment