Colchester Institute v Revenue & Customs (VAT - INPUT TAX : Business purposes) [2018] UKFTT 479 (TC) (15 August 2018)
Payments made by EFA and SFA to CIC do not amount to consideration for the supply of services; the provision of grant-funded education and vocational training is not an economic activity for VAT purposes and is outside the scope of VAT. There is no entitlement to input VAT recovery in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 479 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: CIC; Respondent: HMRC
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Economic Activity, Consideration, Education Funding, VAT Exemption, Input Tax Recovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CIC
Appellant
HMRC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether grant-funded education/vocational training by further education colleges is an 'economic activity' for VAT purposes
- 2 Whether funding by EFA and SFA constitutes consideration for supplies
- 3 Entitlement to input VAT recovery
Ratio Decidendi
Payments made by EFA and SFA to CIC do not amount to consideration for the supply of services; the provision of grant-funded education and vocational training is not an economic activity for VAT purposes and is outside the scope of VAT. There is no entitlement to input VAT recovery in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- CIC's appeal is dismissed
- No entitlement to input VAT recovery
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment