ETM Window Blinds v Cindy E Toth (Summary Decision _No Action) [2018] DRS 19663 (07 February 2018)

ETM Window Blinds v Cindy E Toth (Summary Decision _No Action) [2018] DRS 19663 (07 February 2018)

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2018] DRS 19663
Parties
Complainant: ETM Window Blinds; Respondent: Cindy E Toth
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
07 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
No Action
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ETM Window Blinds

Complainant

Cindy E Toth

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent was abusive or in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

No Action