Mrs J Kinsella Hill v Citizens Advice Trafford: (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Public Interest Disclosure : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2407675/2015 (27 April 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and subjected to discrimination on the grounds of disability, but not on the grounds of age or sex. The tribunal also found that there was a breach of contract and that the claimant made protected disclosures.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2407675/2015
- Parties
- Claimant: Mrs J Kinsella Hill; Respondent: Citizens Advice Trafford
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partly upheld
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Breach of Contract, Disability Discrimination, Public Interest Disclosure, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs J Kinsella Hill
Claimant
Citizens Advice Trafford
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether the claimant was discriminated against on the grounds of age, sex, or disability
- 3 Whether there was a breach of contract
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and subjected to discrimination on the grounds of disability, but not on the grounds of age or sex. The tribunal also found that there was a breach of contract and that the claimant made protected disclosures.
Court Disposition
Claim partly upheld
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, breach of contract, and detriment for protected disclosure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment