Mr R Patterson v City Facilities Management Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2017] UKET 4100770/2017 (13 November 2017)

Mr R Patterson v City Facilities Management Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2017] UKET 4100770/2017 (13 November 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore could not have suffered detriment as a result.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] UKET 4100770/2017
Parties
Claimant: Mr R Patterson; Respondent: City Facilities Management Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr R Patterson

Claimant

City Facilities Management Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
  2. 2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making the disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore could not have suffered detriment as a result.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed