Citycom Systems Ltd v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX - assessments - Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme support payments - Coronavirus Direction 15 April 2020 - para 9 of schedule 16 to the Finance Act 2020 - sections 34 and 36 Taxes Management Act 1970 - whether payments claimed were excessive) [2025] UKFTT 862 (TC) (17 July 2025)
The Appellant's CJRS claims were not calculated in accordance with the Coronavirus Direction, as the amounts claimed did not reflect the reference salary based on RTI data. HMRC's assessments were correct, competent, and issued within the statutory time limits. The Appellant failed to demonstrate that it had been overcharged or that HMRC's calculations were incorrect. Responsibility for accurate claims lay with the Appellant, not HMRC.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 862
- Parties
- Appellant: Citycom Systems Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (cjrs), Statutory Interpretation, Tax Assessments, HMRC Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Citycom Systems Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the CJRS payments claimed by the Appellant were excessive and not in accordance with the Coronavirus Direction
- 2 Whether HMRC's assessments were correct, competent, and in time under the relevant statutory provisions
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellant's CJRS claims were not calculated in accordance with the Coronavirus Direction, as the amounts claimed did not reflect the reference salary based on RTI data. HMRC's assessments were correct, competent, and issued within the statutory time limits. The Appellant failed to demonstrate that it had been overcharged or that HMRC's calculations were incorrect. Responsibility for accurate claims lay with the Appellant, not HMRC.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment